Learn more:
This video shows how to look for a subgame perfect equilibrium. We start by explaining what subgames are, then look for a Nash equilibrium, and finally look for the subgame equilibrium.
Related videos:
-Repeated games:
-Nash equilibrium:
Related articles:
-Nash equilibrium:
-Game theory:
Thank you for watching!
Learn, and enjoy!
Nguồn: https://potomacstewards.org/
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://potomacstewards.org/game/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- Classic Game Room – ORBITOR 1 pinball machine review
- Let's Play Flink – Fun with Streaming in a Gaming Company
- A Wii U Promise Finally Fulfilled 9 Years Later! (Clubhouse Games Secret)
- DAYZ #5: VŨ TRỤ MỚI – CLAN "VIET NAM BO DOI" PHẢI QUỲ XIN TIỀN BỌN TÂY =))))
- Playstation Move but it's a terrible harry potter game
That's spectacularly wrong, please delete this video!
wrong explanation
how to do a 3×3? game
stnankk
wrong
thank you very much. It was helpful
good
7 subgames correction
The normal form representation of the game is absolutely wrong. Player 2 must have 4 strategies. L & R are only the actions of player 2, his strategies are LL, LR, RL & RR.
why will player 1 choose (3,1)? I didn't understand as up is the dominant strategy for him then why will he choose down ? and why not (5,2) ?
This was amazing.
It finally clicked for me. Thank you, that was well organized and precise.
Hi
according to the solution you show that the sub-game perfect is not Nash equilibrium
D, R in the table. But according to my understand subgame perfect MUST be nash for the initial game
I think your table should have been built with 4 columns LL LR RL RR then you could see that 3,1 is a nash equilibrium
for the game and it is also subgame perfect.
the solution should be
D, LR which means down for player 1 and Left if player 1 choose Up and Right if he choose Down
+ Policonomics, I have a quick question. If the problem can be solved by a 2 X 2 table, then why do we need use to go for a decision tree ? We could have drawn a 2 X 2 table and calculate nash equlibria and solved it.
very interesting! enjoyed it